Martin Gruenberg, the chairman of the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), is set to resign following the findings of an investigation that exposed a toxic work environment within the bank regulator.
On May 20, Gruenberg announced his intention to step down from his role as chair of the FDIC, a position he has held since August 2005. In an email to staff, he stated, “Given recent events, I am prepared to relinquish my responsibilities once a successor has been confirmed.” He added that he would continue to fulfill his duties as Chairman until that time, including the transformation of the FDIC’s workplace culture.
The FDIC is an autonomous agency of the US government that provides insurance coverage for depositors in American commercial and savings banks.
The decision to step down follows the release of a third-party investigation report on May 7, which looked into allegations of sexual harassment and other forms of misconduct at the FDIC, as well as the management’s response to these incidents.
Gruenberg testified before Congress on May 15, addressing the widespread allegations of sexual harassment and mistreatment of subordinates. He faced criticism from both Republicans and Democrats, who expressed shock, anger, and disbelief at the extent of the problems within the FDIC, according to Reuters.
Lawmakers have called for his resignation, with Senate Banking Chair Sherrod Brown also urging President Biden to find a replacement for Gruenberg. The White House has confirmed its intention to nominate a new candidate for the position.
However, Senator Elizabeth Warren expressed confidence in Gruenberg’s ability to bring about change within the agency.
The crypto community has celebrated Gruenberg’s resignation, with Nic Carter, partner at Castle Island Ventures, describing it as “the best day ever.”
Meanwhile, digital asset industry lawyer John Deaton commented on the development, stating:
Gruenberg is believed to have played a significant role in facilitating “Operation Choke Point 2.0.” Coined by Nic Carter in 2023, this term refers to a coordinated effort led by the FDIC to discourage banks from holding cryptocurrency deposits or providing banking services to crypto firms.
In a speech in October 2022, Gruenberg compared crypto assets to risky financial innovations such as subprime mortgages and collateralized debt obligations, which were responsible for the 2008 financial crisis.
Magazine: What do crypto market makers actually do? Liquidity, or manipulation